CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study
Language plays an
important role in improving students’ intelligence, social and physical.
Language helps students gain success in every subject at school. By learning
language, students are expected to be acquainted with themselves, others, their
culture and other culture.
English does not serve
only as a universal language but also as a tool to communicate in oral and
written form to understand and figure out the information, mind, feeling,
science and technology, and culture. English as a subject in school is directed
to improve the four skills, writing, reading, listening and speaking. Learning
English at school is expected to solve daily problems in communication and to
continue their study to the next steps, to enter college or to find a job.
Writing is one of
skills that be taught in teaching English. Writing has relative close with
reading, if someone has a good reading habit, it makes easy to write one topic
in papers with many views and arguments. Writing can help someone to solve
problems and be smarter, because with writing the writer can encourage new
ideas, alternative solution, frame work theory and so on. Many students feel
that writing is a good method in learning, because they can study to understanding
grammatical and vocabulary well.
Writing is most
complexes skill and hard work, so teachers should be encourage the students to
write continually. Although writing is most complexes skill, some people said
that writing is easy. To write appropriately, people must have good
capabilities in writing. They must be able to organize the ideas to construct
the sentences, to use punctuation and spelling appropriately. In the normal
teaching and learning, a teacher can use apendekatan
untuk menyampaikan materi pelajaran kepada siswa. technique to
delivering course material to students.Salah satu
pendekatan One technique can be used is the technique of mind mapping.
Prinsip
pendekatan pembelajaran ini adalah sebuah alat bantu
untuk berfikir kritis, kreatif,Basically, mind map is a diagram
or graphdigunakan untuk merepresentasikan
kata-kata, ide, pekerjaan, atau hal lain yang used to represent words,
ideas, work, or something elseterhubung dan
tersusun secara radial mengelilingi sebuah kata yang mengandung ide
connected and arranged radically around a word that contains ideasutama ( main idea ). primary. According
to Michael Michalko in Buzan (2008) mind mapping is alternative thinking of
brains toward linear thinking. Mind map is a powerful graphic techniquedan menjadi kunci yang universal untuk membuka potensi
dari seluruh otak, karena and become a universal key to unlock the
potential of the entire brain, becausemenggunakan
seluruh keterampilan yang terdapat pada bagian neo-korteks dari otak
using all the skills contained in the neo-cortex of the brainatau yang lebih dikenal sebagai otak kiri dan otak
kanan. or better known as the left brain and right brain. Based on the
statement, it is clearly stated that mind mapping helps students to use their brain
as good as possible. They can easy to get information and remember it.
Based on the basic
competence for eighth grade, the students will deal with many kinds of the
texts such as descriptive text, recount text, narrative text, and also
procedural text. Students must have capabilities in writing. They should be
able to recognize vocabularies and grammatical in English, so they can arrange
the sentences well. Although, every student has different characteristics and
style in learning, an English teachers need to provide an appropriate technique
or approach that can make writing process joyful. Teacher has to choose a good and
appropriate technique in teaching. One of techniques can be chosen is mind
mapping.
Buzan (2003) argues
that the students can learn in an interesting way using certain technique which
is called Mind Mapping. In the usage of mind mapping, students not only use
their left side of the brain to identify
words but in the same time they also use the right side of the brain in learning
language. They will have opportunity to make some colorful pictures, lines,
symbols or signs to help them remember the words or the facts in their mind
maps. So, every student will not feel depressed in understanding the material.
Referring to those
explanations above, the researcher is intended to investigate a research
entitled ”The effectiveness of mind mapping technique in writing descriptive
text for the eighth graders of SMPN 2 Sakra in the school year of 2011/2012”.
B. Scope of the Study
In order to investigate
more deeply, present researcher gave limitation on the subject and object of
the study.
1.
The subject of this study was limited to the eighth
graders of SMPN 2 Sakra in the school
year of 2011/2012.
2.
The object of this study was limited to the
effectiveness of mind mapping technique in writing descriptive text.
C. Statement of the Problems
Based on the background
of the problems above, the researcher formulated the problems of this
observation in the form of research questions as follows:
1.
Is mind mapping
technique effective in teaching writing of descriptive text for the eighth
graders of SMPN 2 Sakra in the school
year of 2011/2012?
2.
To what extend is the effectiveness of mind mapping
technique in teaching writing descriptive text for the eighth graders of SMPN 2 Sakra in the school year of
2011/2012?
D. Purposes of the Study
The study was aimed at investigating the effectiveness of mind
mapping technique in writing descriptive text for the eighth graders of SMPN 2 Sakra in the school year of
2011/2012, focusing on the
following points:
1.
To know whether mind mapping is effective in teaching
writing descriptive text for the eighth graders of SMPN 2 Sakra in the school year of 2011/2012.
2.
To find out the effectiveness of mind mapping technique
in teaching writing descriptive text for the eighth graders of SMPN 2 Sakra
in the school year of 2011/2012.
E. Significance of the Study
The result of this
study was intended to give contribution in teaching English both theoretically
and practically.
1.
Theoretically
a. The
result of this study is expected to be a basic knowledge for further research of
mind mapping technique in
writing.
b. The
result of this study is expected as reference to the other researcher who wants
to study more about descriptive writing text by using mind mapping technique.
2.
Practically
a.
For the teacher
1. The
result of this study is expected to be able to contribute any use for language
teachers in teaching English.
2. The
result of this study is expected to help the teachers solve the problems in
teaching especially writing skill.
b.
For the students
1. The
finding of this study is expected as guidance for language teachers in teaching
English mainly to increase the students’ achievement in writing.
2. The
finding of this study is expected as guidance for English teachers
to motivate the students in learning English better.
c.
For the researcher
1. The
result of this study is expected to prove technique in teaching English
especially in writng descriptive text.
2. The
result of this study is expected as reference to conduct further research about
this study.
CHAPTER II
REVIEW AND LITERATURE AND
HYPOTHESIS
A. Mind
Mapping
1. Definition
of Mind Mapping
Some people realize that
diagram or chart can help them rearrange and visualize the ideas that on their
mind. They usually use symbols or pictures that can represent words and ideas
to helps them remember well. In 1960s, an English psychologist names Tony Buzan
introduced and developed this idea which is later well-known as Mind Mapping
Technique.
Buzan and Abbot (2010, p. 4) stated
“mind mapping is an easy way to place information to brain and take information
out from brain. Mind Mapping is creative and effective way to write and will
map your mind by a simple way”. Mind map helps students to learn, arrange, and
store information in their brain. Information can be illustrated with symbols,
words, color, images, links, and attachments to add context, helping to reveal
new directions, greater clarity, and big ideas. Because of mind map
illustration using a creative method (symbols, words, color, images), it easy
and pleasure to see, read, understanding, and memorizeIt. Mind mapping can solve problem in a large
areas, it is possible to make decision, and collect the data.
All mind mapping is using
color and the form is radiant thinking. All mind maps have nature structure
which spray from the center. By the lines, symbol, words, and picture which
related in simply, basic, nature series with brain. Using mind map, long list
information could change into colorful diagram, well regulated, and easy to
memorize.
“A picture is worth a thousand
words” is a widely used proverb. A picture has an effective on a mental representation
is that readers recognize the utility of the picture and spend sufficient time
processing it. However, teachers should start asking how systematically
students have been trained to process and understand graphs, not to mention how
they have been trained to monitor text (and text-graph) coherence.
Mind mapping is a creative
thinking involves all of mentality skills of brain. The human brain consists of
two parts; left hemisphere, and right hemisphere. In the usage of mind mapping,
students not only use their left side of the
brain to identify words but in the same time they also use the right side of
the brain in learning language.
Table
1
Function
of Brain
Left brain
|
Right brain
|
Words or language
|
Rhythm
|
Rational thinking
|
Space
|
Numeracy
|
Gestalt (the whole of picture)
|
Sequential
|
Imagination
|
Linear
|
Daydream
|
Analytical
|
Color
|
List
|
Dimension
|
2. The
Step of Making Mind Mapping
A teacher must be able to
choose appropriate technique to increasing students’ comprehension in writing.
One of techniques can be chosen is mind maps. Mind maps enhance the learning of
writing text by encouraging students to take many words quickly at once rather
than one word at a time. Buzan and Abbot (2010) explain seven steps in making
mind map:
a. Start
from the center of a blank page turned sideways. The idea of beginning in the
center is designed to give the brain the creative freedom to branch out in all
direction.
b. Use
an image or picture for your central idea because images have a strong impact
on our imagination and memory. It also pleases sight and keeps attention
focused.
c. Use
color throughout. Color stimulates creative thinking helps distinguish area of
creative though, stimulates the visual centers of the brain and captures the
eye’s attention and interest.
d. Connect
mind branches to the central image and connect second and third level branches
to first and second levels. This kind of connecting is done because the brain
work by association, and if the branches are connected on the page in front of
one, the ideas also connect in one’s head, which will spark off more creative
thought.
e. Make
the branches curved rather than straight. A mind map with straight lines is
boring to the eyes and does not reflect its creative intent! The brain is far
more attracted to the curved lines that are found in nature when it is working
creatively.
f. Use
one word per line. This is done because each single word or image generates its
own vast array of creative thought. When single words are used, they leave the
mind or open to the sparking of new thought, whereas phrases or sentences tend
to dampen that triggering effect. If and idea needs to be expressed in the form
of a phrase, it is important to include only key words and not “enclose” the
thought with grammatical structures.
g. Use
image throughout. Image and symbols are easy to remember, and they stimulate
new creative association.
On other hand, Mega Brain
gives steps to create mind map quickly and effectively can be done by the
following ways:
a. Use
big enough paper, A4 or A3
b. Horizontal
position (landscape)
c. Putting
down a title in the centre of blank paper
d. Make
main branch to write down the gist of one’s thoughts or topic especial (just
keyword). Keyword usually a noun or a verb
e. Main
branch have to be more thick than additional branch
f. Use
block letters, boldface, and chromatic marker
g. Use
picture, sign or symbols to progress visual effect of gist of one’s thoughts.
Use three or four colors to drow main idea.
h. From
the main branch, make branch again to create sub topic
Figure 1.
Mind Map
3.
The Advantages and Disadvantages of Mind Mapping
According to Michael Michalko
in his book cracking creativity cited from Buzan and Abbot (2010), mind mapping
will: active brain, helped mind from mental problem, made us focus on the mind
subject, helped us to showed the connection between information that separated,
gave the clear picture in whole, possible to make us classified the concept,
and help to compare it.
Based on the above statement,
mind map helps students to; planning, communicate, be more creative, solve the
problem, concentrate attention, arrange and explain the ideas, remember well,
learning quickly and efficient.
Mind mapping gives many
advantages. Anything can be mind-mapped, such as: a birthday party, a book one
is reading, one’s plans for the day, notes taken in a class or lecture, flower
arranging, the economy, the meaning of life, or one’s experience of a place of
music. Similar to a road map, a mind map will: give an overview of a large
subject or area, encourage problem solving by seeing new creative pathways,
enable students to be extremely efficient and enjoyable to look at, read, muse
over and remember.
Furthermore, Buzan explains
that mind map gives advantages than linear note. The advantages of mind mapping
(Buzan, 1995) :
a. The
centre of mind map (main idea) is defined clearly.
b. The
level of each idea is shown clearly. The important idea near of the centre and
on other hand.
c. The
relation between keywords can be known quickly because of its relation. It
makes the remembering of students more effective.
d. Mind
map is seen different with other maps
e. The
structure of mind map has probably to add the new information.
While, the disadvantages of mind mapping; need
a lot of time in organization, difficulties to alocate the time, need many times
to find an effective keyword, too load
the students.
B. Writing
1. Definition
of Writing
Writing is an activity to
write a language by using signs or symbols. Writing is the representation of
language in a textual medium through the use of a set of signs or symbols. It
is distinguished from illustration, such as cave drawing, painting, and
non-symbolic preservation of language via non-textual media, such as magnetic
tape audio.
Writing is a combination of
process and product (Sokolik, 2003) as cited from Linse (2005). Sokolik explain
that the process of writing is by collecting all the ideas or data that we have,
managing it then providing it into the good result which also known as product.
Furthermore, writing means the act or art of forming letters and characters on
paper, wood, stone, or other material, for the purpose of recording the ideas
which characters and words express, or of communicating them to others by
visible signs. This suggests composition instruction that recognizes the
importance of generating, formulating, and refining one’s idea.
2.
Aspect of Writing
Writing is one language skill
which must be taught to the students. It is the same importance as the other
language skills. It is an indirectly way of communication but it is very
important in human life in expressing thoughts and feelings in the form of
writing especially for the students.
Writing is not easy, so it is
needed many exercises continuously. In writing there are some aspects must be
known, they are namely;
a. micro
aspect (spelling, punctuation, etc.), and
b. macro
aspect (content, organization).
Heaton (1984) said that there
are four skills involved in writing competence; grammatical skill, stylizes
skill and mechanical skill and judgment skill. Grammatical skill is the ability
to write correct sentences. Stylistic skill is the ability to manipulate
sentences in effective language. Mechanical skill is the ability to apply the
graph convention such as; spelling and punctuation. Judgment skill is the
ability to write in an appropriate manner for a particular purpose. While, Harris
(1986) states that, the writing competence has four aspects; orthography,
structure, vocabulary, and fluency.
1)
Orthography is language sound description which is in
the form of writing or a symbol and language spelling system.
2)
Structure is the arrangement of rules in a language
becoming meaningful language units.
3)
Vocabulary is the total number of word in a language
4)
Fluency in the writing ability implemented with a
properly speed, not too slow or not too fast.
Based on these theories above,
aspects of writing should be measure were; grammatical, vocabulary, mechanic
and relevancy.
3.
Types of Writing
Alwasilah (2005) mentions four
types of writing that called as “EDAN”, which means expository writing,
descriptive writing, argumentative writing, and narrative writing.
a. Expository
writing
Expository writing is a kind of writing that aims at clarifying,
explaining, teaching, or evaluating an issue. The author tries to give
information or sign to the reader by developing idea with giving an example,
process, cause and result, classification, definitions, analyses, compare, and
contrary.
In every piece of expository writing, a good writer should consider
the basic characteristic of a good expository writing. A good expository
writing should contain three elements, namely the purpose, audience and topics.
To the students, purpose is the goal that they need to discover by themselves.
The personality chosen should lonely be selected after considering the purpose
of writing. Next, the other element is a topic. It is also a very important element
in writing essay because the topic is identified in writing assignment.
b. Descriptive
writing
Starting form etymology the word ‘description’ is derived from word:
describe, meanings a hint or to write about. So, the word description means
something that is being traced or drawn. It is refers to aim of description to
describe a particular person, place or thing.
Descriptive text is a kind of writing that is used to describe about a
person, object, appearance, scenery, or phenomenon. In this text, the author
tries to make readers as like they see, feel, and experience what the story
tell. Description could briefly explain and evolve about process, compare,
definitions, and other strategies. Meanwhile, the generic structure of
description is identification and description.
c. Argumentative
writing
Argumentative writing is a kind of writing that aims to prove the
truth or untruth of a statement or situations. The writer tries to show the
empirical data by giving a logical appeal, pathetic or affective appeals, such
as authority, empirical data, logical appeals, and values or attitude.
In daily experiences, life is touched at almost every point by
argumentation. Argument is use to avoid disorder. On the other hand, the
purpose of the argument is to support a direct opinion about some ideas,
position or piece of information that have encountered in reading. Furthermore,
to create a well developed statement of argumentative must either; re call those experiences, ideas, or place
information that first led you to the conclusion.
d. Narrative writing
Narrative original from “to narrate” means to tell. This is the kind
of writing that means to tell a story. It can be used to introduce or illustrate
a complicated, subject were writer often uses narration to provide a detailed,
personal account of “what happened”. Narrative is about a chronological story (true
or just a fictional). It deals with problematic events which lead to a crisis
or turning point of some kind, which in turn finds a resolution.
On other hand, narrative usually refers to the story and the term is used
here to describe and experience that in the past (Past narration), typical
experience (What people usually do), or it happens now (Present narration).
4. Process
of Writing
People write every day.
Students write papers for their college course. Businessman communicates ideas
in reports and memos. Journalist composes new stories and so on. Before realize
that writing is a hard work but writing is also opportunity to convey something
he/she didn’t know. To make good use of those opportunities, he/she needs
develop the confidence that will enable them to overcome, whatever the
frustration a writing assignment may present.
When someone starts writing,
he/she does not exactly follow the same basic steps as they write, it just
flows based on their mind. In detail, the writing process can be classified
into several broad categories such as planning, drafting and revising. This
categories should be done integrally and continuously to get a perfect writing.
Teaching writing does not only
focus on the result but also the process of writing. White and Arndt’s model
(Harmer, 2001) can represent the writing process; drafting, structuring (ordering
information, experimenting with arrangement), reviewing (checking context,
connections, assesing impact, editing), focusing, and the last is generating
idea and evaluation.
|
Drafting
|
Structuring
|
Focusing
|
Evaluating
|
Reviewing
|
Generating
ideas
|
Figure 2. White and
Arndt’s Process Writing Model
In addition, during
understanding process of writing, students engage in pre-writing, planning drafting,
and post writing activities they will be discussed.
a.
Pre-Writing
Pre-writing is the first
stage in writing process, begins long before the writer puts thoughts into
writing the experiences, observations and interactions that students have an
impact upon when and how they will write it.
b.
Planning
After students have generated
some ideas, they must decide what they will say about their chose topic.
Students develop an initial plan for the product they will compose. As they do
so, they must consider the purpose, audience, point of view and format because
these elements have implications for both the planning and the drafting of the
written product.
c.
Drafting
At this point in the
process, the emphasis is on content and meaning rather than on mechanics and
conventions this is the time for written to get down their ideas and thoughts,
composing rough drafts based upon pre-writing and planning activities and
considerations.
d. Post
Writing
When students have an
authentic audience and purpose, they want to rework their writhen drafts,
polishing them for presentations or publications. Teachers may encourage
students to share certain pieces or determine the number of pieces that the
students a required to share or publish within a set time period, but
ultimately the decision about which pieces to share, and with whom should be
left up to the writer.
5.
Descriptive Text
D’Angelo (1980, as cited in
Setiawan, 2007) stated that description is a way of picturing images verbally
in speech of writing and of arranging does image in some kind of logical
pattern. Description could briefly explain and evolve about process, compare,
definitions, and other strategies. Descriptive writing is a kind of writing
that is used for describe about a person, object, place, appearance, scenery,
or phenomenon. Descriptive text is a kind of writing genre that first taught in
the level of junior high school. A descriptive text has a functional objective
to describe a particular person, place, things (Depdiknas,2006). From the book
“Making sense of functional grammar” by Gerot and Wignell (1995) it is stated
that descriptive text is a kind of the text which is aimed to describe a
particular person, place, or things. Referring these theories can be formulated
that descriptive writing vividly explained about a person, place, or thing which
can make the reader as imagine it.
In a descriptive writing,
there are four kinds of descriptive texts that can be explored: first,
historical profile, providing an interesting accurate report bout place, times,
or event. Second, venture profile, deeply reporting about occupation or
business. Third, reporting from interview, field observation, and other
research. Forth, a case study which is telling about someone experience for
representing a cluster, for example: the sacrifice of disaster, immigrant community,
and the last, personal research report; serve the story specifically about an
observation which entertaining you, it is can be about an usual hobby,
new technology, etc.
(Alwasillah, 2005).
Djuhaire (2009) classifies a
descriptive text into two parts, first is identification; introduction about
subject or something that want to describe, and the last is description; giving
an information about characteristics of subjects.
Furthermore, the generic
structure of descriptive text can be seen in the following table:
Table
2
The
Generic Structure of Descriptive Text
Goal
|
To describe a particular person, place and
thing
|
Generic Structure
|
·
Identification : identifies phenomenon to be
describe
·
Description : describes parts, qualities,
characteristics
|
Language Feature
|
·
Focus on specific participant
·
Using detailed noun phrases, a noun word that
added into adjective, medley kind of adjective that has quality of
describing, numbering, classifying, relational process
·
Using specific noun and simple present tense
·
Using verbs described about condition of
participant and signal of propriety
·
Using figurative words as way to give compare
illustrations
|
C. Relevant
Study
The similar problem had
been investigated by Novita Sari Asmiaty. She investigated about “Using Mind Mapping Technique to Improve Students’
Ability in Reading Descriptive Text; A Quasi Experimental Study of Seventh
Grade Students at SMPN 12 Bandung
in academic year of 2008/2009”.
There were three
problems formulated in her study, those were (1) is the use of mind mapping
technique effective in improving students’ ability in reading descriptive text
for the seventh grade students at SMPN 12 Bandung in academic year of
2008/2009? (2) From the students’ perception, what are problems found in using
mind mapping technique to learn descriptive text? And (3) what are the advantages and
disadvantages in using mind mapping technique in learning descriptive text for
the seventh grade students at SMPN 12 Bandung in academic year of
2008/2009?
The research design of
the present researcher was Quasi Experimental Study by using two groups
experiment (experimental group and control group). The instrument used in
collecting data was pilot test in form of multiple choices.
The second study had
been investigated also by Deasy Ramayanti. She investigated about “Using Mind Mapping Technique to Improve Students’
Ability in Writing Descriptive Text; A Quasi Experimental Study of Eighth Grade
Students at Junior High school in SMPN 12 Bandung in academic year
of 2008/2009”.
There were two problems
formulated in her study, those were “(1) Does mind mapping technique improve
students’ ability in writing descriptive text? And (2) what are the students’
responses toward the use of mind mapping in learning descriptive text?
The research design of
the present researcher was Quasi Experimental Study by using two groups
experiment (experimental group and control group). The instruments of the
research were, pre-test, post-test and questionnaires.
The similarities of
these researches were in investigating the main problem that is mind mapping
technique as the variable in investigating.
D. Theoretical
Framework
Theoretical framework is
the basic thinking of the research. In theoretical Framework, the present
researcher thinks based on students’ problem in studying English, especially in
teaching and learning process, many problems and activities faced by students
and the teacher. But successful of the students in studying English is mostly
determined by themselves inside (students) and outside (teacher, environment,
and their family) of the school.
Other problems come
from the strange of the materials, confused, and uninteresting situation when
teaching learning process in the classroom. So the teacher’s duty is how to
develop the students’ interest in studying English especially in writing,
because writing is one of language components that have function to express
feelings, opinion, ideas, and emotion. Teacher should be finding out the
appropriate technique in teaching English, so students can remind and
understanding the materials well. One of techniques can be used is mind
mapping. And through mind mapping as one of technique is facilitating to teach writing and it is able to overcome the
failure of students in studying it. Later, it can be the best way of to solve students’ problem to understand a difficult
task.
The present researcher
thought that by using mind mapping in teaching and learning process, will be
better to develop students’ ability and increasing the students’ achievement in
writing ability especially. And practical applications were able to develop the
present researcher viewed same understanding how to apply teaching and learning
of English to increase student’s ability in writing.
E. Hypothesis
Hypothesis original
from “hupo” means (temporary) and “thesis” (statement or theory). So, hypothesis
is temporary solution or statement that is not yet acknowledged as true on
hundred percents.
Based on the above
explanation, the hypothesis of this study was formulated as follow “mind mapping technique is significantly effective in
teaching writing descriptive text for the eighth graders of SMPN 2 Sakra in the school year of
2011/2012.
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. Setting of the Study
This study was done
at the second semester for the eighth
graders of SMPN 2 Sakra of the school
year 2011/2012.
B. Research Design
Research design is
really needed by a researcher in order to know the way to analyze the data of
the study. The research design in this study was a pre
experimental design, by using one group experiment; those were pre-test
and post-test design. In this case; the present researcher analyzed students’ writing
ability before and after giving treatment by using Mind Mapping Technique.
Experimental Group
|
Pretest
|
Treatment
|
Posttest
|
|
O1
|
X
|
O2
|
Figure 3. Research
Design
According to Gall (Gall
& Borg, 2003) research design above includes three steps; 1)
Implementation of pretest to measure dependent variable, 2) Treatment, 3)
Posttest to measure the result and effect toward dependent variable.
Referring to the above
explanation, the present researcher used pre experimental design. In this
design, observation was done twice; they were before treatment (O1) and
after treatment (O2). To know the effectiveness of mind mapping technique present
researcher compared scores of pretest and posttest.
C. Population and Sample of the Study
1. Population of the Study
Riduwan (2004, p. 55) states
“Population is the whole of characteristics or unit about the result of
measurement as the object of the research. Furthermore, Punaji (2010) states that Population is all of the subjects where are samples
will be taken.
Referring on these theories,
it said that population is object or subject that stay in one area and have
definite characteristics related to problems of the research. The target
population of this study was
six classes of the eighth graders of SMP
2 Sakra in the school year 2011/2012, and students were still actively
learning English as one of compulsory subject, as shown in table 3:
Table 3
The
Population of the Study
No.
|
Class
|
Sum of Population
|
1
|
VII-1
|
34 students
|
2
|
VII-2
|
34 students
|
3
|
VII-3
|
34 students
|
4
|
VII-4
|
34 students
|
5
|
VII-5
|
34 students
|
6
|
VII-6
|
34 students
|
|
TOTAL
|
204 students
|
2. Sample of the Study
Sample is the smaller group or subset of population. Sugiono (1997) states that sample is a part of
number and characteristic of population. Based on this statement can be concluded that
sample is a part of population that have definite characteristic or condition will be
observed.
Referring to above theory the present
reseacher took one class from the total of population by using cluster
random sampling. This technique was used because the population were supposed that
they were homogeneous.
After that, the present reseacher was taken a part of them by using lottery. As the result, the class VII-1 was chosen as the sample
of the study which consists of 30 students.
D.
Collecting Data
1. Identifying
the Variable
Variable is all of something
that will be object observation in the research Referring on the title of this
study, there was a variable in this study namely mind mapping technique in
writing descriptive text.
2. Defining the Variable
a. Mind
mapping
Mind mapping defines as a technique of making
graphical outline which is use to represent words, ideas, tasks, or another linked
to an arranged radically around a central keyword or idea by lines and
typically it contains words, colors, short phrase or pictures.
b. Writing
descriptive text
Writing descriptive text is a kind of writing
that is used for describe about a person, object, appearance, scenery, or
phenomenon which can make the reader as imagine it. Description can briefly
explain and evolve about process, compare, definitions, and other strategies.
3. Instrument
of the Study
Instrument is a tool used to
collect the data. To know the effectiveness of teaching writing descriptive
text using mind mapping technique, the researcher used test to collect the data. The students administrated
test, so the researcher divided the score into four criteria, namely grammar,
vocabulary, mechanic, and relevancy. To score the students writing scripts the
present researcher had subjective
scoring.
After that, to get the mean, the scores from all criteria
were summed and divided into four criteria. The pre-test was administrated
before the treatment implemented. Moreover, the post-test was administrated
after the researcher implemented the treatment to the experimental class.
An instrument is used
in one research must be valid. Punaji (2010, p. 18) found “an instrument will
be valid if it is able to measure what should be measured.”
Based on the theory above, the researcher used writing
test that was taken from English course book for Junior High School. The
researcher did not try out the test but the researcher used two kinds of
validity namely; construct validity and content validity.
a.
Construct
validity
According to
Nurgiyantoro (2009), construct validity refers to the extent to which the
results of the data collection process can be interpreted in terms of
underlying psychological construct. While, Punaji (2010) states that
construct validity is important to measures students’ ability or psychological
construct. Based on these explanations, the instrument has construct validity if there is a relationship between
theory and concept of the competence needed to accomplish the tests in
this study. The instrument was
consulted to English teacher, and a course book is being used for Junior High School level. So, it was
categorized into a valid test.
b.
Content
validity
Punaji (2010) states that content
validity refers to the extent an instrument describe or reflect content that is
expected. Meanwhile, Nurgiyantoro (2009) states that content validity refers to
the extent to which data collection process measures a representative sample of
the subject matter or behavior that should be encompassed by the operational
definition. In addition, Purwanto (2008, p. 138) states “the test has content
validity if the scope and content of the test based on the curriculum that has
been taught”. Before deciding content validity, the researcher creates
blueprint based on the topic.
4. Technique
of Collecting Data
Collecting the data in this
study, researcher used written test. The present researcher administrated the
steps to collect data as follow:
a.
Pre-test
The present researcher administrated
pre-test to the students. The pre-test was in written test form. The scores were
taken in four criteria, namely; grammar, vocabulary, mechanic, and relevancy.
Then, to get the mean, the scores from all criteria were summed and divided
into four.
b.
Treatment (teaching and learning process)
The present researcher asked each student
about the material for experimental in pre-test and post-test. In this case,
the present researcher used mind mapping technique.
c.
Post-test
The present researcher administrate
post-test to the students. The test was similar with the pre-test. However, the
post-test was given after the treatment, in teaching writing by using mind
mapping technique. The scores were taken in four criteria, which were the
scores of word grammatical accuracy, vocabulary, mechanic, and relevancy.
The whole of the kinds of test was evaluated by
researcher as follows:
Table
4
Scoring
Guidelines for Analytical Scheme of Writing Skill
Element
|
Level
|
Criteria
|
Grammar
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
Meaningless
Reflects Indonesia structure
but still under stable
Contains mistakes in using
verbs
Contains random mistakes in
using verb be form noun, adverb and adjective.
The writing script uses
complete and perfect grammar.
|
Vocabulary
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
The score less than 20
different words
20 – 29 different words
30 – 39 different words
40 – 90 different words
More than of 50 different words
|
Mechanic
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
Writing is unwritten and
meaningless.
Contains random mistakes in
punctuation and spelling.
Contains random mistakes in
spelling of word
Contains random mistakes in
using punctuation mark
The spelling and the
punctuation are perfect.
|
Relevancy
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
The writing script is poor of
unity.
There are random mistakes in
sentence order.
There is a lack of cohesion
There is a light shift of the
topic between sentence and does not disturb cohesion.
The writing is relevance enough
to the topics
|
E.
Analyzing
Data
1.
Descriptive Statistics
After the data had been
collected, the present researcher found the descriptive statistic, but before
it done, the researcher found the mean score (M)
and standard deviation (SD) of students’ score. To get mean score of pre-test
and post-test, the researcher used the following
formula:
Where:
= the mean score
∑ = sum of
Xi = the
number of each data
n = the number of data
(Riduwan & Sunarto, 2010)
Meanwhile, to get the standard
deviation of sample, the researcher used the following formula:
Where:
s = standard deviation
= the number
of deviation
(Riduwan &
Sunarto, 2010)
2.
Hypothesis Testing
To analyze the hypothesis
testing manually which was aimed to know whether
the alternative hypothesis was accepted or not, the present researcher finds
r-test first before analyzing t-test. It can be used the following
formula:
r =
To know the effectiveness of
mind mapping method in writing descriptive text, the present researcher used
the formula as follows
Where:
r = correlation score of X1
and X2
n = the number of sample
= mean score of
pretest
= mean score of
posttest
s1 = standard deviation of pretest
s2 = standard deviation of posttest
S1 = variant of pretest
S2 = variant of posttest
(Riduwan &
Sunarto, 2010):
The
hypothesis criteria, if:
t test
≥ t tabel, it means that Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected
(significant)
t test ≤ t tabel, it means
that Ha is rejected and Ho is accepted (not significant)
(Riduwan & Sunarto, 2010)
All data were
calculated by using computer package SPSS 17.0 for
Windows.
CHAPTER IV
RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION
A. Descriptive Statistics
The
research result in this study is
description about students writing improvement especially in writing
descriptive text for the eighth graders of SMPN
2 Sakra after treatment implemented and after students followed written
test in pretest and posttest. The treatment used in this research was mind
mapping technique.
In collecting data of the study, present
researcher used written test by using mind mapping technique. In scoring the
tests, the present researcher tested the students by giving a picture relating
to the material. In giving the scores, the present researcher evaluated the
students’ writing score as seen in table 4. It showed four elements were
important to be scored; those were grammar, vocabulary, mechanic, and relevancy.
In this study, the students made a mind mapping based on the picture, and then
write it in descriptive text form.
Before the treatment implemented, the
present researcher administrated pre-test to the students and collected the
results. The purpose of pre-test was to know how far the students’ achievement
by writing a descriptive text relating to the material was given by their
teacher. After pretest was done, the treatment implemented in teaching and
learning process, in this study the treatment was mind mapping technique. At
the end of treatment, the present researcher administrated the posttest to the
students and collected the results of students’ achievement to know whether mind
mapping technique effective or not in writing descriptive text for the eighth
graders of SMPN 2 Sakra in the school
year of 2011/2012.
Based on the data analysis in
pre-experimental design, it can be seen that from pre-test up to post-test
increased. Referring to the data in pre-test, the result of students writing
test as follow: the lowest and the highest scores of students grammatical
accuracy were 1 and 5, the students’ score of vocabulary, 1 was the lowest and
4 was the highest. Mechanical score found by the present researcher was 1 for
the lowest category and 5 was the highest, and the relevancy was 1 for lowest and
5 for highest (Appendix: 4).
In post-test, the students’ scores based
on the data were gained as follows: the lowest and the highest scores of
students grammatical accuracy were 1 and 5, the students’ score of vocabulary,
2 was the lowest and 4 was the highest. Mechanical score found by the present
researcher was 2 for the lowest category and 5 was the highest, and the
relevancy was 1 for lowest and 5 for highest (Appendix: 4).
Furthermore, the scores of the students’ writing
descriptive text of pre-test and post-test were calculated. In pre-test, the
score was 20 and 90, for the lowest and the highest, mean score of pre-test was
42.65, and the standard deviation was 16.525. And then in post-test, it was 45
and 95 were the lowest and the highest, mean score of post-test was 51.91, and
the standard deviation was 9.536. It can be deduced that there were the
development of students’ proficiency in writing ability. To make clearer, the
following is a detail description.
Table 5
Descriptive statistic of descriptive writing on pre and post
Experimental
Design
|
Subject
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Pre-test
|
34
|
42.65
|
16.525
|
Post-test
|
34
|
51.91
|
9.536
|
Based on the result of study, the present
researcher got the mean score and standard deviation from pre-test and post-test
score of the experimental class. The mean, standard deviation and variance of
the score were computed by SPSS 17.0 for Windows. To be clearer, it can be seen
on Table 6:
Table 6
Students’ Scores on Pre-test and Post-test
|
Pre-test
|
|
Post-test
|
N1
|
34
|
Nn2
|
34
|
![]() |
42.65
|
![]() |
51.91
|
s1
|
16.525
|
s₂
|
9.536
|
S1
|
273,076
|
S₂
|
90,935
|
Source: Research Data
Explanation:
N =
Number of students

s2 =
Standard deviation
S2 =
Variance
Based on the data on Table 6, it can be
seen there was difference between students’ writing skill before and after mind
mapping technique implemented. Mean of the students’ score after mind mapping
technique implemented was higher than mean of the students’ score before
treatment implemented.
B. Testing Hypothesis
To analyze whether there was a significant
difference between students’ writing skill before and after the implementation
of mind mapping technique, the present researcher used t-test method to get answer the hypothesis. The
hypothesis criteria, if: ttable
≤ ttest, it meant
that Ho was rejected and ttable
≥ ttest, it meant that Ho
was accepted. The result of t-test was
to know whether the hypothesis was accepted or rejected. The hypothesis in this
study was mind mapping technique significantly effective in writing descriptive
text for the eighth graders of SMPN 2 Sakra
in the school year 2011/2012. To be clearer, the result of hypothesis
testing after analyzed by using SPSS 17 for Windows can be seen on Table 7:
Table 7
The Result of Hypothesis Testing
t-test
|
t-table
|
df
|
Conclusion
|
4.649
|
2.033
|
33
|
Hypothesis is accepted
|
Source: Research Data
After analyzed the data by using t-test
at the level of significance (a) 5%, the present researcher got t-test was 4.642,
it showed that there was a significant difference between the students’ writing
skills before and after mind mapping technique implemented 0.727 (see appendix
6).
C. Discussion
Based on the result of the study, the
present researcher found students’ writing skill before using mind mapping
technique, and students’ writing skill after using mind mapping technique. The
data of students’ writing skill before mind mapping technique conducted, the
present researcher found mean score of pre-test was 42.65 and mean score of
post-test was 51.91(see appendix 6).
It was clear
from the results of students’ score after mind mapping technique implemented better than before it implemented in writing
descriptive text. The subjects showed a satisfactory improvement with four
aspects in writing; those were grammar, vocabulary, mechanic, and relevancy. It
was noticed that mind mapping technique was
effective in students' writing in descriptive text.
The results also showed from hypothesis
testing, the present researcher got t-test = 4.649 at the level
significance (a)
5%, it showed that there was a significant difference between the students’
achievement in writing descriptive before and after mind mapping technique implemented.
It meant that mind mapping technique was significantly effective in writing descriptive text.
Furthermore, the
implemented of mind mapping technique provide
the students’ opportunity to deal with variety procedure in teaching writing thereby
develop their writing skill especially in writing descriptive. During the
experiment of the current study, the subjects (experimental class) were
involved in the processes of interaction between teacher and learners. This
activity made the students more active in teaching and learning process because
all students had chance to describe their mind and encourage their ideas. Thus,
it can be said that mind mapping technique able
to make atmosphere of class being fun, active, and effective. Mind
mapping technique is usable for teacher and students. Teacher can use mind mapping
technique to teach materials and increase students’ improvement in writing,
while students can use mind mapping technique to understanding and remembering the
materials easily.
CHAPTER
V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
A.
Conclusion
Based on results, the present researcher can conclude that
there is significantly different in the mean score between students’ writing
skill before and after treatment conducted. It also shows from the result of
hypothesis testing which are computed by SPSS 17.0 program for windows that is
0.000 < 0.01 (2-tailed) and based on t-test
criteria, if t-test is
bigger than t-table, it
means that Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected. Besides students’ writing achievement
with mind mapping technique is better than the students’ writing achievement
without mind mapping technique at the level of believe 95%.
B.
Suggestions
This research describes the effectiveness of mind mapping
technique in writing descriptive text. Based on the result of this study, the present
researcher has some recommendations.
- Using mind mapping technique in teaching and learning process make the students more active.
- In implementing mind mapping technique in teaching and learning process, the teacher should more pay attention the students’ creativity in making mind mapping.
- Opportunities should be provided for students to practice writing in order to improve their writing skill.
- Mind mapping technique is better implemented in small class because teacher will be easier in managing the class especially in testing students’ writing.
- Because of mind mapping need a lot of times in implementing, teacher should allocate the time as well as possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment